Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square

Congo
0.2677 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
0.2363 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
128th
Equatorial Guinea rank
130th

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square over time

  • Congo
  • Equatorial Guinea
0.050.10.150.20.25196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.2677 kg per square kilometre against 0.2363 kg per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0314 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Congo ranks 128th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 130th of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0642 kg per square kilometre 0.1131 kg per square kilometre 0.0489 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.1029 kg per square kilometre 0.1341 kg per square kilometre 0.0312 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.0899 kg per square kilometre 0.1461 kg per square kilometre 0.0562 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.1283 kg per square kilometre 0.172 kg per square kilometre 0.0437 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.1744 kg per square kilometre 0.195 kg per square kilometre 0.0207 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.2472 kg per square kilometre 0.2156 kg per square kilometre 0.0316 kg per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.2647 kg per square kilometre 0.2331 kg per square kilometre 0.0316 kg per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per square, Congo or Equatorial Guinea?
Congo, at 0.2677 kg per square kilometre against 0.2363 kg per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per square between Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
0.0314 kg per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per square?
Congo ranks 128th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 130th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/equatorial-guinea/">Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.