Cuba vs Uganda: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square

Cuba
21.17 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
21.16 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
45th
Uganda rank
46th

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square over time

  • Cuba
  • Uganda
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 21.17 kg per square kilometre against 21.16 kg per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 0.01 kg per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 45th and Uganda ranks 46th of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 6 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 17.63 kg per square kilometre 0.1212 kg per square kilometre 17.51 kg per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 17.08 kg per square kilometre 0.4909 kg per square kilometre 16.59 kg per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 19.72 kg per square kilometre 1.4 kg per square kilometre 18.32 kg per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 21.15 kg per square kilometre 5.9 kg per square kilometre 15.25 kg per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 19.78 kg per square kilometre 8.52 kg per square kilometre 11.25 kg per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 22.46 kg per square kilometre 14.47 kg per square kilometre 7.99 kg per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 16.41 kg per square kilometre 20.61 kg per square kilometre 4.2 kg per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per square, Cuba or Uganda?
Cuba, at 21.17 kg per square kilometre against 21.16 kg per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per square between Cuba and Uganda?
0.01 kg per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Uganda rank globally for swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per square?
Cuba ranks 45th and Uganda ranks 46th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Uganda: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/cuba/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/cuba/uganda/">Cuba vs Uganda: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.