Estonia vs Papua New Guinea: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square

Estonia
17.13 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
16.13 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Estonia rank
54th
Papua New Guinea rank
57th

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square over time

  • Estonia
  • Papua New Guinea
01020304050196119922023

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 17.13 kg per square kilometre against 16.13 kg per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 1 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.

Estonia ranks 54th and Papua New Guinea ranks 57th of 149 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 28.29 kg per square kilometre 10.42 kg per square kilometre 17.87 kg per square kilometre Estonia
2000s 21.31 kg per square kilometre 13.47 kg per square kilometre 7.84 kg per square kilometre Estonia
2010s 20.73 kg per square kilometre 15.19 kg per square kilometre 5.53 kg per square kilometre Estonia
2020s 18.21 kg per square kilometre 15.8 kg per square kilometre 2.41 kg per square kilometre Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per square, Estonia or Papua New Guinea?
Estonia, at 17.13 kg per square kilometre against 16.13 kg per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per square between Estonia and Papua New Guinea?
1 kg per square kilometre, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Papua New Guinea?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Estonia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per square?
Estonia ranks 54th and Papua New Guinea ranks 57th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Papua New Guinea: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/estonia/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/estonia/papua-new-guinea/">Estonia vs Papua New Guinea: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.