Guatemala vs Sao Tome and Principe: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square

Guatemala
34.65 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
40.51 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
32nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
30th

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square over time

  • Guatemala
  • Sao Tome and Principe
010203040196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 40.51 kg per square kilometre against 34.65 kg per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 5.86 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.2 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 32nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 30th of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 6 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 7.21 kg per square kilometre 4.11 kg per square kilometre 3.1 kg per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 8.57 kg per square kilometre 3.14 kg per square kilometre 5.44 kg per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 7.26 kg per square kilometre 2.11 kg per square kilometre 5.15 kg per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 14.11 kg per square kilometre 1.99 kg per square kilometre 12.11 kg per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 29.3 kg per square kilometre 10.65 kg per square kilometre 18.65 kg per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 33.37 kg per square kilometre 31.07 kg per square kilometre 2.3 kg per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 34.65 kg per square kilometre 38.09 kg per square kilometre 3.44 kg per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per square, Guatemala or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 40.51 kg per square kilometre against 34.65 kg per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per square between Guatemala and Sao Tome and Principe?
5.86 kg per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per square?
Guatemala ranks 32nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 30th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Sao Tome and Principe: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/sao-tome-and-principe/">Guatemala vs Sao Tome and Principe: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.