China vs Latvia: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of

China
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Latvia
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2023
China rank
52nd
Latvia rank
51st

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of over time

  • China
  • Latvia
00.0010.0010.0020.002196119922023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in China, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was China ahead.

China ranks 52nd and Latvia ranks 51st of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP China
2000s 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP China
2010s 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP China
2020s 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of, China or Latvia?
Latvia, at 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of between China and Latvia?
0 kg per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do China and Latvia rank globally for swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of?
China ranks 52nd and Latvia ranks 51st of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Latvia: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/china/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/china/latvia/">China vs Latvia: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP
Unit
kg per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,190 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.