Cuba vs New Caledonia: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of

Cuba
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2020
New Caledonia
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Cuba rank
64th
New Caledonia rank
65th

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of over time

  • Cuba
  • New Caledonia
000000.001196519942023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 64th and New Caledonia ranks 65th of 149 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and New Caledonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP Cuba
1980s 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
1990s 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP Cuba
2000s 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP Cuba
2010s 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP Cuba
2020s 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of, Cuba or New Caledonia?
Cuba, at 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia as of 2020.
What is the difference in swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of between Cuba and New Caledonia?
0 kg per US$ of GDP, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and New Caledonia?
51 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2020.
How do Cuba and New Caledonia rank globally for swine, market — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of?
Cuba ranks 64th and New Caledonia ranks 65th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs New Caledonia: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/cuba/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/cuba/new-caledonia/">Cuba vs New Caledonia: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP
Unit
kg per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,190 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.