China, Taiwan Province of vs Uganda: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated

China, Taiwan Province of
3.79 million kg
in 2023
Uganda
4.24 million kg
in 2023
China, Taiwan Province of rank
46th
Uganda rank
45th

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated over time

  • China, Taiwan Province of
  • Uganda
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M196119922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 4.24 million kg against 3.79 million kg in China, Taiwan Province of, a difference of 456,230 kg.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times China, Taiwan Province of's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Taiwan Province of ahead.

China, Taiwan Province of ranks 46th and Uganda ranks 45th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Taiwan Province of averaged higher in 6 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Taiwan Province of Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 2.17 million kg 24,216 kg 2.15 million kg China, Taiwan Province of
1970s 2.52 million kg 98,083 kg 2.43 million kg China, Taiwan Province of
1980s 4.44 million kg 279,573 kg 4.16 million kg China, Taiwan Province of
1990s 6.74 million kg 1.18 million kg 5.56 million kg China, Taiwan Province of
2000s 5.11 million kg 1.70 million kg 3.41 million kg China, Taiwan Province of
2010s 4.25 million kg 2.90 million kg 1.35 million kg China, Taiwan Province of
2020s 3.94 million kg 4.13 million kg 193,788 kg Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — losses from manure treated, China, Taiwan Province of or Uganda?
Uganda, at 4.24 million kg against 3.79 million kg in China, Taiwan Province of as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — losses from manure treated between China, Taiwan Province of and Uganda?
456,230 kg, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Taiwan Province of and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Taiwan Province of and Uganda rank globally for swine, market — losses from manure treated?
China, Taiwan Province of ranks 46th and Uganda ranks 45th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Taiwan Province of vs Uganda: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/china-taiwan-province-of/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/china-taiwan-province-of/uganda/">China, Taiwan Province of vs Uganda: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).