El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated

El Salvador
311,827 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
321,253 kg
in 2023
El Salvador rank
97th
Zimbabwe rank
96th

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated over time

  • El Salvador
  • Zimbabwe
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 321,253 kg against 311,827 kg in El Salvador, a difference of 9,426 kg.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 97th and Zimbabwe ranks 96th of 172 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 506,093 kg 124,499 kg 381,594 kg El Salvador
1970s 590,085 kg 173,238 kg 416,846 kg El Salvador
1980s 489,588 kg 177,664 kg 311,924 kg El Salvador
1990s 314,670 kg 236,822 kg 77,848 kg El Salvador
2000s 466,954 kg 219,270 kg 247,684 kg El Salvador
2010s 360,192 kg 269,836 kg 90,356 kg El Salvador
2020s 311,827 kg 281,778 kg 30,049 kg El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — losses from manure treated, El Salvador or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 321,253 kg against 311,827 kg in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — losses from manure treated between El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
9,426 kg, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Zimbabwe rank globally for swine, market — losses from manure treated?
El Salvador ranks 97th and Zimbabwe ranks 96th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/el-salvador/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/el-salvador/zimbabwe/">El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).