Micronesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated

Micronesia
196,168 kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
472,519 kg
in 2023
Micronesia rank
16th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
14th

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Micronesia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 472,519 kg against 196,168 kg in Micronesia, a difference of 276,351 kg.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 2.4 times Micronesia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Micronesia ranks 16th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 14th of 20 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 38,170 kg 90,706 kg 52,536 kg United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 39,541 kg 120,032 kg 80,492 kg United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 41,010 kg 205,742 kg 164,732 kg United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 139,298 kg 320,127 kg 180,829 kg United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 161,204 kg 413,223 kg 252,019 kg United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 181,137 kg 450,018 kg 268,882 kg United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 193,832 kg 469,789 kg 275,958 kg United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — losses from manure treated, Micronesia or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 472,519 kg against 196,168 kg in Micronesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — losses from manure treated between Micronesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
276,351 kg, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Micronesia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for swine, market — losses from manure treated?
Micronesia ranks 16th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 14th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/micronesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/micronesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Micronesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).