Samoa vs Zimbabwe: Swine, market β€” Losses from manure treated

Samoa
326,051 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
321,253 kg
in 2023
Samoa rank
95th
Zimbabwe rank
96th

Swine, market β€” Losses from manure treated over time

  • Samoa
  • Zimbabwe
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 326,051 kg against 321,253 kg in Zimbabwe, a difference of 4,798 kg.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Samoa ahead.

Samoa ranks 95th and Zimbabwe ranks 96th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Samoa Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 125,531 kg 124,499 kg 1,032 kg Samoa
1970s 165,521 kg 173,238 kg 7,717 kg Zimbabwe
1980s 480,993 kg 177,664 kg 303,329 kg Samoa
1990s 596,053 kg 236,822 kg 359,231 kg Samoa
2000s 645,340 kg 219,270 kg 426,070 kg Samoa
2010s 527,451 kg 269,836 kg 257,615 kg Samoa
2020s 326,275 kg 281,778 kg 44,496 kg Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market β€” losses from manure treated, Samoa or Zimbabwe?
Samoa, at 326,051 kg against 321,253 kg in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market β€” losses from manure treated between Samoa and Zimbabwe?
4,798 kg, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Samoa and Zimbabwe rank globally for swine, market β€” losses from manure treated?
Samoa ranks 95th and Zimbabwe ranks 96th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, market β€” Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Samoa vs Zimbabwe: Swine, market β€” Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/samoa/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/samoa/zimbabwe/">Samoa vs Zimbabwe: Swine, market β€” Losses from manure treated</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market β€” Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).