Tonga vs Zimbabwe: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated

Tonga
287,289 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
321,253 kg
in 2023
Tonga rank
99th
Zimbabwe rank
96th

Swine, market — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Tonga
  • Zimbabwe
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 321,253 kg against 287,289 kg in Tonga, a difference of 33,964 kg.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Tonga's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Tonga ranks 99th and Zimbabwe ranks 96th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Tonga averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tonga Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 98,106 kg 124,499 kg 26,392 kg Zimbabwe
1970s 198,734 kg 173,238 kg 25,496 kg Tonga
1980s 329,007 kg 177,664 kg 151,343 kg Tonga
1990s 297,239 kg 236,822 kg 60,417 kg Tonga
2000s 277,023 kg 219,270 kg 57,753 kg Tonga
2010s 283,162 kg 269,836 kg 13,326 kg Tonga
2020s 286,799 kg 281,778 kg 5,020 kg Tonga

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — losses from manure treated, Tonga or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 321,253 kg against 287,289 kg in Tonga as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — losses from manure treated between Tonga and Zimbabwe?
33,964 kg, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tonga and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Tonga and Zimbabwe rank globally for swine, market — losses from manure treated?
Tonga ranks 99th and Zimbabwe ranks 96th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tonga vs Zimbabwe: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/tonga/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/tonga/zimbabwe/">Tonga vs Zimbabwe: Swine, market — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).