Eswatini vs Puerto Rico: Swine, market — Manure applied to soils

Eswatini
632,482 kg
in 2023
Puerto Rico
550,556 kg
in 2023
Eswatini rank
113th
Puerto Rico rank
116th

Swine, market — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Eswatini
  • Puerto Rico
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 632,482 kg against 550,556 kg in Puerto Rico, a difference of 81,926 kg.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Puerto Rico's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Eswatini ranks 113th and Puerto Rico ranks 116th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Puerto Rico in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1960s 134,786 kg 2.27 million kg 2.13 million kg Puerto Rico
1970s 221,200 kg 3.18 million kg 2.96 million kg Puerto Rico
1980s 238,853 kg 2.75 million kg 2.51 million kg Puerto Rico
1990s 403,438 kg 2.41 million kg 2.00 million kg Puerto Rico
2000s 463,654 kg 920,616 kg 456,963 kg Puerto Rico
2010s 516,922 kg 603,078 kg 86,157 kg Puerto Rico
2020s 645,921 kg 550,560 kg 95,361 kg Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — manure applied to soils, Eswatini or Puerto Rico?
Eswatini, at 632,482 kg against 550,556 kg in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — manure applied to soils between Eswatini and Puerto Rico?
81,926 kg, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Puerto Rico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Puerto Rico rank globally for swine, market — manure applied to soils?
Eswatini ranks 113th and Puerto Rico ranks 116th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, market — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Puerto Rico: Swine, market — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/eswatini/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/eswatini/puerto-rico-us/">Eswatini vs Puerto Rico: Swine, market — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).