Australia vs Rwanda: Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that leaches

Australia
3.29 million kg
in 2023
Rwanda
2.90 million kg
in 2023
Australia rank
64th
Rwanda rank
65th

Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that leaches over time

  • Australia
  • Rwanda
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 3.29 million kg against 2.90 million kg in Rwanda, a difference of 385,060 kg.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 64th and Rwanda ranks 65th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 2.32 million kg 165,550 kg 2.16 million kg Australia
1970s 3.34 million kg 298,635 kg 3.04 million kg Australia
1980s 3.38 million kg 461,115 kg 2.92 million kg Australia
1990s 3.53 million kg 558,506 kg 2.97 million kg Australia
2000s 3.46 million kg 1.56 million kg 1.90 million kg Australia
2010s 3.07 million kg 4.87 million kg 1.80 million kg Rwanda
2020s 3.28 million kg 4.21 million kg 929,250 kg Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — manure applied to soils that leaches, Australia or Rwanda?
Australia, at 3.29 million kg against 2.90 million kg in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — manure applied to soils that leaches between Australia and Rwanda?
385,060 kg, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Rwanda rank globally for swine, market — manure applied to soils that leaches?
Australia ranks 64th and Rwanda ranks 65th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Rwanda: Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that leaches. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content/australia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content/australia/rwanda/">Australia vs Rwanda: Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that leaches</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).