New Caledonia vs Uruguay: Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)

New Caledonia
0.1148 kg per person
in 2023
Uruguay
0.1197 kg per person
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
81st
Uruguay rank
79th

Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content) over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Uruguay
0.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0.1197 kg per person against 0.1148 kg per person in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0049 kg per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 81st and Uruguay ranks 79th of 149 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1881 kg per person 0.3912 kg per person 0.2032 kg per person Uruguay
1970s 0.1398 kg per person 0.3658 kg per person 0.2261 kg per person Uruguay
1980s 0.1705 kg per person 0.2127 kg per person 0.0422 kg per person Uruguay
1990s 0.1316 kg per person 0.2257 kg per person 0.0941 kg per person Uruguay
2000s 0.1122 kg per person 0.2013 kg per person 0.0891 kg per person Uruguay
2010s 0.1173 kg per person 0.1553 kg per person 0.038 kg per person Uruguay
2020s 0.1155 kg per person 0.1259 kg per person 0.0104 kg per person Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), New Caledonia or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 0.1197 kg per person against 0.1148 kg per person in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content) between New Caledonia and Uruguay?
0.0049 kg per person, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Uruguay rank globally for swine, market — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content)?
New Caledonia ranks 81st and Uruguay ranks 79th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Uruguay: Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-capita/new-caledonia/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-capita/new-caledonia/uruguay/">New Caledonia vs Uruguay: Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.