Malta vs Sao Tome and Principe: Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)

Malta
130.02 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
124.45 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
9th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
10th

Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content) over time

  • Malta
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 130.02 kg per square kilometre against 124.45 kg per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 5.57 kg per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 9th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 10th of 149 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 71.91 kg per square kilometre 12.62 kg per square kilometre 59.29 kg per square kilometre Malta
1970s 83.21 kg per square kilometre 9.64 kg per square kilometre 73.57 kg per square kilometre Malta
1980s 242.12 kg per square kilometre 6.49 kg per square kilometre 235.63 kg per square kilometre Malta
1990s 331.22 kg per square kilometre 6.12 kg per square kilometre 325.1 kg per square kilometre Malta
2000s 275.67 kg per square kilometre 32.72 kg per square kilometre 242.95 kg per square kilometre Malta
2010s 163.12 kg per square kilometre 95.46 kg per square kilometre 67.66 kg per square kilometre Malta
2020s 132.13 kg per square kilometre 117.04 kg per square kilometre 15.09 kg per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), Malta or Sao Tome and Principe?
Malta, at 130.02 kg per square kilometre against 124.45 kg per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content) between Malta and Sao Tome and Principe?
5.57 kg per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malta and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for swine, market — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content)?
Malta ranks 9th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 10th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Sao Tome and Principe: Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-square-kilometre/malta/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-square-kilometre/malta/sao-tome-and-principe/">Malta vs Sao Tome and Principe: Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.