How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?

44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs Namibia: Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)

Ecuador

0 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Namibia

0 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Ecuador rank

54th

Namibia rank

56th

Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content) over time

Ecuador
Namibia

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Namibia, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 54th and Namibia ranks 56th of 149 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP	Ecuador
1990s	0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP	Ecuador
2000s	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	Ecuador
2010s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Ecuador
2020s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), Ecuador or Namibia?: Ecuador, at 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content) between Ecuador and Namibia?: 0 kg per US$ of GDP, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?: 44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Namibia rank globally for swine, market — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content)?: Ecuador ranks 54th and Namibia ranks 56th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Namibia: Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/ecuador/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/ecuador/namibia/">Ecuador vs Namibia: Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per unit of GDP
Unit: kg per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 151 places, 8,190 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.