Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Melanesia
2.11 million kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
1.45 million kg
in 2023
Melanesia rank
10th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
12th

Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Melanesia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196119922023

How they compare

Melanesia currently reports 2.11 million kg against 1.45 million kg in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 657,450 kg.

That makes Melanesia's figure about 1.5 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Melanesia has been ahead every year.

Melanesia ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 12th of 20 countries.

Melanesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Melanesia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 680,441 kg 278,685 kg 401,756 kg Melanesia
1970s 846,495 kg 368,787 kg 477,708 kg Melanesia
1980s 1.02 million kg 632,122 kg 392,375 kg Melanesia
1990s 1.38 million kg 983,559 kg 400,677 kg Melanesia
2000s 1.84 million kg 1.27 million kg 568,734 kg Melanesia
2010s 2.03 million kg 1.38 million kg 646,411 kg Melanesia
2020s 2.07 million kg 1.44 million kg 631,482 kg Melanesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Melanesia or United Republic of Tanzania?
Melanesia, at 2.11 million kg against 1.45 million kg in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
657,450 kg, with Melanesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for swine, market — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Melanesia ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 12th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/melanesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/melanesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).