Panama vs Trinidad and Tobago: Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per

Panama
81.77 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
79.88 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama rank
59th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
61st

Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per over time

  • Panama
  • Trinidad and Tobago
50100150196119922023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 81.77 kg per square kilometre against 79.88 kg per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 1.89 kg per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Panama ranks 59th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 61st of 149 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 36.9 kg per square kilometre 91.02 kg per square kilometre 54.12 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 35.14 kg per square kilometre 130.9 kg per square kilometre 95.75 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 41.27 kg per square kilometre 147.96 kg per square kilometre 106.68 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 49.99 kg per square kilometre 98.81 kg per square kilometre 48.82 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 57.82 kg per square kilometre 114.87 kg per square kilometre 57.05 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 67.85 kg per square kilometre 86.44 kg per square kilometre 18.59 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 78.21 kg per square kilometre 86.51 kg per square kilometre 8.29 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — manure management (manure treated, n content), per, Panama or Trinidad and Tobago?
Panama, at 81.77 kg per square kilometre against 79.88 kg per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — manure management (manure treated, n content), per between Panama and Trinidad and Tobago?
1.89 kg per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Panama and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for swine, market — manure management (manure treated, n content), per?
Panama ranks 59th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 61st of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Trinidad and Tobago: Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/panama/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/panama/trinidad-and-tobago/">Panama vs Trinidad and Tobago: Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.