Solomon Islands vs South Africa: Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per

Solomon Islands
15.58 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
15.73 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Solomon Islands rank
110th
South Africa rank
109th

Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per over time

  • Solomon Islands
  • South Africa
5101520196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 15.73 kg per square kilometre against 15.58 kg per square kilometre in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.15 kg per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Solomon Islands ranks 110th and South Africa ranks 109th of 149 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Solomon Islands South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 6.53 kg per square kilometre 16.7 kg per square kilometre 10.16 kg per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 10.9 kg per square kilometre 15.85 kg per square kilometre 4.95 kg per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 13.66 kg per square kilometre 16.58 kg per square kilometre 2.92 kg per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 14.88 kg per square kilometre 18.6 kg per square kilometre 3.72 kg per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 15.07 kg per square kilometre 19.43 kg per square kilometre 4.36 kg per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 15.35 kg per square kilometre 18.16 kg per square kilometre 2.81 kg per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 15.56 kg per square kilometre 15.91 kg per square kilometre 0.3496 kg per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — manure management (manure treated, n content), per, Solomon Islands or South Africa?
South Africa, at 15.73 kg per square kilometre against 15.58 kg per square kilometre in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — manure management (manure treated, n content), per between Solomon Islands and South Africa?
0.15 kg per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Solomon Islands and South Africa rank globally for swine, market — manure management (manure treated, n content), per?
Solomon Islands ranks 110th and South Africa ranks 109th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Solomon Islands vs South Africa: Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/solomon-islands/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/solomon-islands/south-africa/">Solomon Islands vs South Africa: Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.