How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chile: Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per

Bosnia and Herzegovina

0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Chile

0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Bosnia and Herzegovina rank

55th

Chile rank

56th

Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per over time

Bosnia and Herzegovina
Chile

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP in Chile, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 55th and Chile ranks 56th of 149 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bosnia and Herzegovina	Chile	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0012 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0009 kg per US$ of GDP	Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s	0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s	0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — manure management (manure treated, n content), per, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Chile?: Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — manure management (manure treated, n content), per between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile?: 0 kg per US$ of GDP, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile rank globally for swine, market — manure management (manure treated, n content), per?: Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 55th and Chile ranks 56th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chile: Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/bosnia-and-herzegovina/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/bosnia-and-herzegovina/chile/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chile: Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit of GDP
Unit: kg per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 151 places, 8,190 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.