Australia and New Zealand vs Burundi: Swine, market — Manure management

Australia and New Zealand
21.31 million kg
in 2023
Burundi
22.23 million kg
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
47th
Burundi rank
45th

Swine, market — Manure management over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Burundi
010.0M20.0M30.0M196119922023

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 22.23 million kg against 21.31 million kg in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 916,400 kg.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 47th and Burundi ranks 45th of 172 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Burundi Difference Ahead
1960s 18.91 million kg 114,763 kg 18.80 million kg Australia and New Zealand
1970s 23.40 million kg 409,076 kg 22.99 million kg Australia and New Zealand
1980s 23.22 million kg 1.06 million kg 22.16 million kg Australia and New Zealand
1990s 23.92 million kg 1.45 million kg 22.47 million kg Australia and New Zealand
2000s 23.14 million kg 2.31 million kg 20.83 million kg Australia and New Zealand
2010s 20.31 million kg 7.49 million kg 12.82 million kg Australia and New Zealand
2020s 21.29 million kg 18.64 million kg 2.64 million kg Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — manure management, Australia and New Zealand or Burundi?
Burundi, at 22.23 million kg against 21.31 million kg in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — manure management between Australia and New Zealand and Burundi?
916,400 kg, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Burundi?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Burundi rank globally for swine, market — manure management?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 47th and Burundi ranks 45th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Burundi: Swine, market — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/australia-and-new-zealand/burundi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/australia-and-new-zealand/burundi/">Australia and New Zealand vs Burundi: Swine, market — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).