Bhutan vs Equatorial Guinea: Swine, market — Manure management

Bhutan
114,446 kg
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
108,148 kg
in 2023
Bhutan rank
151st
Equatorial Guinea rank
154th

Swine, market — Manure management over time

  • Bhutan
  • Equatorial Guinea
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 114,446 kg against 108,148 kg in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 6,298 kg.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 151st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 154th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 5 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 184,659 kg 51,746 kg 132,913 kg Bhutan
1970s 201,734 kg 61,374 kg 140,361 kg Bhutan
1980s 244,883 kg 66,861 kg 178,022 kg Bhutan
1990s 196,001 kg 78,703 kg 117,298 kg Bhutan
2000s 126,200 kg 89,244 kg 36,956 kg Bhutan
2010s 70,076 kg 98,664 kg 28,588 kg Equatorial Guinea
2020s 99,706 kg 106,671 kg 6,965 kg Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — manure management, Bhutan or Equatorial Guinea?
Bhutan, at 114,446 kg against 108,148 kg in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — manure management between Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea?
6,298 kg, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for swine, market — manure management?
Bhutan ranks 151st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 154th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Equatorial Guinea: Swine, market — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/bhutan/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/bhutan/equatorial-guinea/">Bhutan vs Equatorial Guinea: Swine, market — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).