Eswatini vs Tonga: Swine, market — Manure management

Eswatini
671,644 kg
in 2023
Tonga
658,618 kg
in 2023
Eswatini rank
114th
Tonga rank
115th

Swine, market — Manure management over time

  • Eswatini
  • Tonga
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 671,644 kg against 658,618 kg in Tonga, a difference of 13,026 kg.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 114th and Tonga ranks 115th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Tonga Difference Ahead
1960s 143,132 kg 224,911 kg 81,779 kg Tonga
1970s 234,896 kg 455,603 kg 220,707 kg Tonga
1980s 253,642 kg 754,258 kg 500,615 kg Tonga
1990s 428,419 kg 681,428 kg 253,009 kg Tonga
2000s 492,363 kg 635,083 kg 142,720 kg Tonga
2010s 548,929 kg 649,156 kg 100,227 kg Tonga
2020s 685,916 kg 657,494 kg 28,421 kg Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, market — manure management, Eswatini or Tonga?
Eswatini, at 671,644 kg against 658,618 kg in Tonga as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, market — manure management between Eswatini and Tonga?
13,026 kg, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Tonga?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Tonga rank globally for swine, market — manure management?
Eswatini ranks 114th and Tonga ranks 115th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Tonga: Swine, market — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/eswatini/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-market-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/eswatini/tonga/">Eswatini vs Tonga: Swine, market — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, market — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).