Ethiopia vs Malta: Swine, market — Stocks
Swine, market — Stocks over time
- Ethiopia
- Malta
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 33,280 An against 32,211 An in Malta, a difference of 1,069 An.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Malta ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 140th and Malta ranks 141st of 188 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19,929 An | 77,400 An | 57,471 An | Malta |
| 2000s | 25,110 An | 68,292 An | 43,182 An | Malta |
| 2010s | 30,376 An | 40,411 An | 10,034 An | Malta |
| 2020s | 32,521 An | 32,733 An | 212.4 An | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher swine, market — stocks, Ethiopia or Malta?
- Ethiopia, at 33,280 An against 32,211 An in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in swine, market — stocks between Ethiopia and Malta?
- 1,069 An, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Malta?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Malta rank globally for swine, market — stocks?
- Ethiopia ranks 140th and Malta ranks 141st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, market — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).