Australia and New Zealand vs Belarus: Swine — Stocks

Australia and New Zealand
2.72 million An
in 2023
Belarus
2.49 million An
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
41st
Belarus rank
44th

Swine — Stocks over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Belarus
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M196119922023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 2.72 million An against 2.49 million An in Belarus, a difference of 226,930 An.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 41st and Belarus ranks 44th of 172 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Belarus in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Belarus Difference Ahead
1990s 3.07 million An 4.02 million An 954,685 An Belarus
2000s 2.95 million An 3.49 million An 534,580 An Belarus
2010s 2.59 million An 3.33 million An 740,761 An Belarus
2020s 2.72 million An 2.59 million An 123,138 An Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — stocks, Australia and New Zealand or Belarus?
Australia and New Zealand, at 2.72 million An against 2.49 million An in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — stocks between Australia and New Zealand and Belarus?
226,930 An, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Belarus?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Belarus rank globally for swine — stocks?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 41st and Belarus ranks 44th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Belarus: Swine — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-stocks/australia-and-new-zealand/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-stocks/australia-and-new-zealand/belarus/">Australia and New Zealand vs Belarus: Swine — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).