Australia and New Zealand vs Guatemala: Swine — Stocks

Australia and New Zealand
2.72 million An
in 2023
Guatemala
2.94 million An
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
41st
Guatemala rank
39th

Swine — Stocks over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Guatemala
1.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 2.94 million An against 2.72 million An in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 217,930 An.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 41st and Guatemala ranks 39th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 5 and Guatemala in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 2.41 million An 611,374 An 1.80 million An Australia and New Zealand
1970s 2.99 million An 726,923 An 2.26 million An Australia and New Zealand
1980s 2.96 million An 615,920 An 2.35 million An Australia and New Zealand
1990s 3.05 million An 1.20 million An 1.86 million An Australia and New Zealand
2000s 2.95 million An 2.48 million An 469,830 An Australia and New Zealand
2010s 2.59 million An 2.83 million An 237,117 An Guatemala
2020s 2.72 million An 2.94 million An 220,550 An Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — stocks, Australia and New Zealand or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 2.94 million An against 2.72 million An in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — stocks between Australia and New Zealand and Guatemala?
217,930 An, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Guatemala rank globally for swine — stocks?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 41st and Guatemala ranks 39th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Guatemala: Swine — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-stocks/australia-and-new-zealand/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-stocks/australia-and-new-zealand/guatemala/">Australia and New Zealand vs Guatemala: Swine — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).