Iceland vs Montenegro: Swine — Stocks
Swine — Stocks over time
- Iceland
- Montenegro
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 26,000 An against 24,883 An in Montenegro, a difference of 1,117 An.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 149th and Montenegro ranks 151st of 188 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43,428 An | 11,516 An | 31,912 An | Iceland |
| 2010s | 30,815 An | 24,020 An | 6,795 An | Iceland |
| 2020s | 26,250 An | 24,883 An | 1,367 An | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher swine — stocks, Iceland or Montenegro?
- Iceland, at 26,000 An against 24,883 An in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in swine — stocks between Iceland and Montenegro?
- 1,117 An, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Montenegro rank globally for swine — stocks?
- Iceland ranks 149th and Montenegro ranks 151st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).