Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Russian Federation: Swine — Stocks

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
36.91 million An
in 2023
Russian Federation
27.61 million An
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
19th
Russian Federation rank
7th

Swine — Stocks over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Russian Federation
10.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M196119922023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 36.91 million An against 27.61 million An in Russian Federation, a difference of 9.30 million An.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 1.3 times Russian Federation's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 19th and Russian Federation ranks 7th of 33 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 3 and Russian Federation in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 16.55 million An 24.58 million An 8.03 million An Russian Federation
2000s 19.42 million An 16.05 million An 3.37 million An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 28.13 million An 19.93 million An 8.20 million An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 36.02 million An 26.20 million An 9.81 million An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — stocks, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Russian Federation?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 36.91 million An against 27.61 million An in Russian Federation as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — stocks between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Russian Federation?
9.30 million An, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Russian Federation?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Russian Federation rank globally for swine — stocks?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 19th and Russian Federation ranks 7th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Russian Federation: Swine — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-stocks/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-stocks/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/russian-federation-2/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Russian Federation: Swine — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).