Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs New Caledonia: Temporary crops — Area

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
3.11 1000 ha
in 2024
New Caledonia
4.19 1000 ha
in 2024
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha rank
174th
New Caledonia rank
172nd

Temporary crops — Area over time

  • Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
  • New Caledonia
01234200120122024

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 4.19 1000 ha against 3.11 1000 ha in Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, a difference of 1.08 1000 ha.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.3 times Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 174th and New Caledonia ranks 172nd of 208 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha New Caledonia Difference Ahead
2000s 2.9 1000 ha 4.2 1000 ha 1.3 1000 ha New Caledonia
2010s 3.04 1000 ha 3.94 1000 ha 0.9021 1000 ha New Caledonia
2020s 3.11 1000 ha 4.19 1000 ha 1.08 1000 ha New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher temporary crops — area, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 4.19 1000 ha against 3.11 1000 ha in Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha as of 2024.
What is the difference in temporary crops — area between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and New Caledonia?
1.08 1000 ha, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and New Caledonia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and New Caledonia rank globally for temporary crops — area?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 174th and New Caledonia ranks 172nd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Temporary crops — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs New Caledonia: Temporary crops — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/temporary-crops-area/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/temporary-crops-area/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/new-caledonia/">Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs New Caledonia: Temporary crops — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Temporary crops — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 6,187 data points, 1998–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.