Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs French Polynesia: Temporary fallow — Area

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
0.45 1000 ha
in 2024
French Polynesia
0.49 1000 ha
in 2024
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha rank
170th
French Polynesia rank
169th

Temporary fallow — Area over time

  • Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
  • French Polynesia
00.20.40.6200120122024

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 0.49 1000 ha against 0.45 1000 ha in Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, a difference of 0.04 1000 ha.

That makes French Polynesia's figure about 1.1 times Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ahead.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 170th and French Polynesia ranks 169th of 205 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha averaged higher in 2 and French Polynesia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha French Polynesia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.5656 1000 ha 0.23 1000 ha 0.3356 1000 ha Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2010s 0.503 1000 ha 0.2963 1000 ha 0.2067 1000 ha Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2020s 0.454 1000 ha 0.459 1000 ha 0.005 1000 ha French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher temporary fallow — area, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or French Polynesia?
French Polynesia, at 0.49 1000 ha against 0.45 1000 ha in Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha as of 2024.
What is the difference in temporary fallow — area between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and French Polynesia?
0.04 1000 ha, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and French Polynesia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and French Polynesia rank globally for temporary fallow — area?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 170th and French Polynesia ranks 169th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Temporary fallow — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs French Polynesia: Temporary fallow — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/temporary-fallow-area/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/french-polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/temporary-fallow-area/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/french-polynesia/">Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs French Polynesia: Temporary fallow — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Temporary fallow — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 6,187 data points, 1998–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.