Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Western Sahara: Temporary fallow — Area

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
0.45 1000 ha
in 2024
Western Sahara
0.45 1000 ha
in 2024
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha rank
171st
Western Sahara rank
171st

Temporary fallow — Area over time

  • Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
  • Western Sahara
00.20.40.6200120122024

How they compare

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha currently reports 0.45 1000 ha against 0.45 1000 ha in Western Sahara, a difference of 0 1000 ha.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Western Sahara has been ahead every year.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 171st and Western Sahara ranks 171st of 208 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha Western Sahara Difference Ahead
2000s 0.5656 1000 ha 0.5656 1000 ha 0 1000 ha
2010s 0.503 1000 ha 0.503 1000 ha 0 1000 ha
2020s 0.454 1000 ha 0.454 1000 ha 0 1000 ha

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher temporary fallow — area, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or Western Sahara?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, at 0.45 1000 ha against 0.45 1000 ha in Western Sahara as of 2024.
What is the difference in temporary fallow — area between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Western Sahara?
0 1000 ha, with Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Western Sahara?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Western Sahara rank globally for temporary fallow — area?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 171st and Western Sahara ranks 171st of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Temporary fallow — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Western Sahara: Temporary fallow — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/temporary-fallow-area/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/western-sahara/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/temporary-fallow-area/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/western-sahara/">Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Western Sahara: Temporary fallow — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Temporary fallow — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 6,187 data points, 1998–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.