Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Temporary fallow — Area

Australia and New Zealand
5,940 1000 ha
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
18,844 1000 ha
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
9th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
11th

Temporary fallow — Area over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k200120122024

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 18,844 1000 ha against 5,940 1000 ha in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 12,904 1000 ha.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 3.2 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 9th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 11th of 225 countries.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2000s 4,698 1000 ha 22,113 1000 ha 17,415 1000 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 5,814 1000 ha 20,211 1000 ha 14,398 1000 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 5,920 1000 ha 18,910 1000 ha 12,990 1000 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher temporary fallow — area, Australia and New Zealand or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 18,844 1000 ha against 5,940 1000 ha in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in temporary fallow — area between Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
12,904 1000 ha, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for temporary fallow — area?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 9th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 11th of 225 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Temporary fallow — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Temporary fallow — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 6,187 data points, 1998–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.