Belarus vs Eswatini: Temporary fallow — Area
Temporary fallow — Area over time
- Belarus
- Eswatini
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 21.97 1000 ha against 19.8 1000 ha in Eswatini, a difference of 2.17 1000 ha.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 134th and Eswatini ranks 135th of 225 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.78 1000 ha | 25.13 1000 ha | 43.65 1000 ha | Belarus |
| 2010s | 22.61 1000 ha | 22.29 1000 ha | 0.314 1000 ha | Belarus |
| 2020s | 22.27 1000 ha | 20.03 1000 ha | 2.23 1000 ha | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher temporary fallow — area, Belarus or Eswatini?
- Belarus, at 21.97 1000 ha against 19.8 1000 ha in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in temporary fallow — area between Belarus and Eswatini?
- 2.17 1000 ha, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Eswatini?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Eswatini rank globally for temporary fallow — area?
- Belarus ranks 134th and Eswatini ranks 135th of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Temporary fallow — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.