Israel vs Rwanda: Temporary fallow — Area
Temporary fallow — Area over time
- Israel
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 103.46 1000 ha against 90 1000 ha in Israel, a difference of 13.46 1000 ha.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Rwanda ahead.
Israel ranks 101st and Rwanda ranks 99th of 225 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.33 1000 ha | 88.56 1000 ha | 0.7778 1000 ha | Israel |
| 2010s | 90 1000 ha | 182.6 1000 ha | 92.6 1000 ha | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 90 1000 ha | 107.06 1000 ha | 17.06 1000 ha | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher temporary fallow — area, Israel or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 103.46 1000 ha against 90 1000 ha in Israel as of 2024.
- What is the difference in temporary fallow — area between Israel and Rwanda?
- 13.46 1000 ha, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Rwanda?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Israel and Rwanda rank globally for temporary fallow — area?
- Israel ranks 101st and Rwanda ranks 99th of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Temporary fallow — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.