Cape Verde vs Djibouti: Terrestrial protected areas
Terrestrial protected areas over time
- Cape Verde
- Djibouti
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 99.5 sq. km against 0.5981 sq. km in Djibouti, a difference of 98.9 sq. km.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 166.4 times Djibouti's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Cape Verde has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 47th and Djibouti ranks 49th of 50 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Djibouti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 99.5 sq. km | 0.5966 sq. km | 98.9 sq. km | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 99.5 sq. km | 0.5973 sq. km | 98.9 sq. km | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher terrestrial protected areas, Cape Verde or Djibouti?
- Cape Verde, at 99.5 sq. km against 0.5981 sq. km in Djibouti as of 2010.
- What is the difference in terrestrial protected areas between Cape Verde and Djibouti?
- 98.9 sq. km, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Djibouti?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2009.
- How do Cape Verde and Djibouti rank globally for terrestrial protected areas?
- Cape Verde ranks 47th and Djibouti ranks 49th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, as compiled by the World Resources Institute, based on data from national authorities, national legislation and inter, published as Terrestrial protected areas (sq. km). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nationally protected areas are totally or partially protected areas of at least 1,000 hectares that are designated as scientific reserves with limited public access, national parks, natural monuments, nature reserves or wildlife sanctuaries, protected landscapes, and areas managed mainly for sustainable use. Marine areas, unclassified areas, and litoral (intertidal) areas are not included. The data also do not include sites protected under local or provincial law.