Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Zambia: Terrestrial protected areas

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
2.84 million sq. km
in 2010
Zambia
271,275 sq. km
in 2010
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
3rd
Zambia rank
1st

Terrestrial protected areas over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
  • Zambia
01.0M2.0M3.0M199020002010

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) currently reports 2.84 million sq. km against 271,275 sq. km in Zambia, a difference of 2.57 million sq. km.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s figure about 10.5 times Zambia's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) has been ahead every year.

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 3rd and Zambia ranks 1st of 6 groups.

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 2.72 million sq. km 271,257 sq. km 2.45 million sq. km Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
2000s 2.81 million sq. km 271,271 sq. km 2.54 million sq. km Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
2010s 2.84 million sq. km 271,275 sq. km 2.57 million sq. km Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher terrestrial protected areas, Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) or Zambia?
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), at 2.84 million sq. km against 271,275 sq. km in Zambia as of 2010.
What is the difference in terrestrial protected areas between Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Zambia?
2.57 million sq. km, with Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Zambia?
21 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Zambia rank globally for terrestrial protected areas?
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 3rd and Zambia ranks 1st of 6 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, as compiled by the World Resources Institute, based on data from national authorities, national legislation and inter, published as Terrestrial protected areas (sq. km). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Zambia: Terrestrial protected areas. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, as compiled by the World Resources Institute, based on data from national authorities, national legislation and inter. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/terrestrial-protected-areas-sq-km/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/terrestrial-protected-areas-sq-km/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/zambia/">Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Zambia: Terrestrial protected areas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Terrestrial protected areas (sq. km)
Unit
sq. km
Source
United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, as compiled by the World Resources Institute, based on data from national authorities, national legislation and inter
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
56 places, 1,170 data points, 1990–2010
Last refreshed

Nationally protected areas are totally or partially protected areas of at least 1,000 hectares that are designated as scientific reserves with limited public access, national parks, natural monuments, nature reserves or wildlife sanctuaries, protected landscapes, and areas managed mainly for sustainable use. Marine areas, unclassified areas, and litoral (intertidal) areas are not included. The data also do not include sites protected under local or provincial law.