Nicaragua vs Serbia: Total Bioenergy — Energy production
Total Bioenergy — Energy production over time
- Nicaragua
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 71,260 TJ against 65,109 TJ in Nicaragua, a difference of 6,151 TJ.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 83rd and Serbia ranks 80th of 197 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53,736 TJ | 38,295 TJ | 15,442 TJ | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 60,116 TJ | 46,329 TJ | 13,787 TJ | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 63,796 TJ | 69,463 TJ | 5,668 TJ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total bioenergy — energy production, Nicaragua or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 71,260 TJ against 65,109 TJ in Nicaragua as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total bioenergy — energy production between Nicaragua and Serbia?
- 6,151 TJ, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Serbia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
- How do Nicaragua and Serbia rank globally for total bioenergy — energy production?
- Nicaragua ranks 83rd and Serbia ranks 80th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Bioenergy — Energy production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.