Costa Rica vs Luxembourg: Total fibre furnish — Import quantity, per capita
Costa Rica
0.0029 t per person
in 2024
Luxembourg
0.0029 t per person
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
61st
Luxembourg rank
62nd
Total fibre furnish — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Costa Rica
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0.0029 t per person against 0.0029 t per person in Luxembourg, a difference of 0 t per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 61st and Luxembourg ranks 62nd of 175 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0097 t per person | 0.0007 t per person | 0.009 t per person | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 0.0062 t per person | 0.0039 t per person | 0.0023 t per person | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 0.0033 t per person | 0.0031 t per person | 0.0003 t per person | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fibre furnish — import quantity, per capita, Costa Rica or Luxembourg?
- Costa Rica, at 0.0029 t per person against 0.0029 t per person in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total fibre furnish — import quantity, per capita between Costa Rica and Luxembourg?
- 0 t per person, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Luxembourg?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Luxembourg rank globally for total fibre furnish — import quantity, per capita?
- Costa Rica ranks 61st and Luxembourg ranks 62nd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total fibre furnish — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total fibre furnish — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.