Japan vs Saudi Arabia: Total fibre furnish — Import quantity, per capita
Japan
0.009 t per person
in 2024
Saudi Arabia
0.0088 t per person
in 2024
Japan rank
42nd
Saudi Arabia rank
43rd
Total fibre furnish — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Japan
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0.009 t per person against 0.0088 t per person in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.0002 t per person.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 42nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 43rd of 175 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0284 t per person | 0.0053 t per person | 0.023 t per person | Japan |
| 2000s | 0.0187 t per person | 0.0073 t per person | 0.0113 t per person | Japan |
| 2010s | 0.0134 t per person | 0.0088 t per person | 0.0046 t per person | Japan |
| 2020s | 0.0105 t per person | 0.0067 t per person | 0.0038 t per person | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fibre furnish — import quantity, per capita, Japan or Saudi Arabia?
- Japan, at 0.009 t per person against 0.0088 t per person in Saudi Arabia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total fibre furnish — import quantity, per capita between Japan and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.0002 t per person, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Saudi Arabia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Saudi Arabia rank globally for total fibre furnish — import quantity, per capita?
- Japan ranks 42nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 43rd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total fibre furnish — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total fibre furnish — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.