Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Serbia and Montenegro: Total fibre furnish — Production, annual growth rate

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
-0.3419 % change on previous year
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro
4.84 % change on previous year
in 2005
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
18th
Serbia and Montenegro rank
17th

Total fibre furnish — Production, annual growth rate over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Serbia and Montenegro
-1000100200300196219932024

How they compare

Serbia and Montenegro currently reports 4.84 % change on previous year against -0.3419 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 5.18 % change on previous year.

That makes Serbia and Montenegro's figure about 14.2 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 18th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 17th of 27 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Serbia and Montenegro in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Serbia and Montenegro Difference Ahead
1990s 4.48 % change on previous year -2.15 % change on previous year 6.63 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 0.0661 % change on previous year 9 % change on previous year 8.94 % change on previous year Serbia and Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fibre furnish — production, annual growth rate, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Serbia and Montenegro?
Serbia and Montenegro, at 4.84 % change on previous year against -0.3419 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2005.
What is the difference in total fibre furnish — production, annual growth rate between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Serbia and Montenegro?
5.18 % change on previous year, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Serbia and Montenegro?
13 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2005.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for total fibre furnish — production, annual growth rate?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 18th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 17th of 27 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fibre furnish — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Serbia and Montenegro: Total fibre furnish — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fibre-furnish-production-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/serbia-and-montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fibre-furnish-production-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/serbia-and-montenegro/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Serbia and Montenegro: Total fibre furnish — Production, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fibre furnish — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 8,199 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Total fibre furnish — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.