Lithuania vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Total fibre furnish — Production, annual growth rate

Lithuania
4.2 % change on previous year
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
-1.24 % change on previous year
in 2024
Lithuania rank
20th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
19th

Total fibre furnish — Production, annual growth rate over time

  • Lithuania
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
-50050100196219932024

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 4.2 % change on previous year against -1.24 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 5.44 % change on previous year.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 3.4 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 23 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.

Lithuania ranks 20th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 19th of 140 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 3 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2184 % change on previous year 1.82 % change on previous year 1.6 % change on previous year Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 8.66 % change on previous year 0.1333 % change on previous year 8.53 % change on previous year Lithuania
2010s 13.55 % change on previous year 2.51 % change on previous year 11.04 % change on previous year Lithuania
2020s 0.5856 % change on previous year -0.8069 % change on previous year 1.39 % change on previous year Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fibre furnish — production, annual growth rate, Lithuania or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Lithuania, at 4.2 % change on previous year against -1.24 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in total fibre furnish — production, annual growth rate between Lithuania and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
5.44 % change on previous year, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Lithuania and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for total fibre furnish — production, annual growth rate?
Lithuania ranks 20th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 19th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fibre furnish — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Total fibre furnish — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fibre-furnish-production-annual-growth-rate/lithuania/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fibre-furnish-production-annual-growth-rate/lithuania/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Lithuania vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Total fibre furnish — Production, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fibre furnish — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 8,199 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Total fibre furnish — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.