Belarus vs Lithuania: Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita
Belarus
0.0552 t per person
in 2024
Lithuania
0.0567 t per person
in 2024
Belarus rank
35th
Lithuania rank
34th
Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita over time
- Belarus
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.0567 t per person against 0.0552 t per person in Belarus, a difference of 0.0015 t per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Belarus ranks 35th and Lithuania ranks 34th of 129 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0035 t per person | 0.009 t per person | 0.0055 t per person | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 0.0062 t per person | 0.0208 t per person | 0.0146 t per person | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.0098 t per person | 0.0494 t per person | 0.0396 t per person | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0.0574 t per person | 0.0581 t per person | 0.0008 t per person | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fibre furnish — production, per capita, Belarus or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 0.0567 t per person against 0.0552 t per person in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total fibre furnish — production, per capita between Belarus and Lithuania?
- 0.0015 t per person, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Lithuania?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Lithuania rank globally for total fibre furnish — production, per capita?
- Belarus ranks 35th and Lithuania ranks 34th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total fibre furnish — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.