Brazil vs Czechia: Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita
Brazil
0.1408 t per person
in 2024
Czechia
0.1476 t per person
in 2024
Brazil rank
17th
Czechia rank
14th
Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita over time
- Brazil
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0.1476 t per person against 0.1408 t per person in Brazil, a difference of 0.0068 t per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Brazil ranks 17th and Czechia ranks 14th of 129 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0467 t per person | 0.079 t per person | 0.0323 t per person | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.072 t per person | 0.1112 t per person | 0.0392 t per person | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.1077 t per person | 0.1272 t per person | 0.0196 t per person | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.1349 t per person | 0.1494 t per person | 0.0145 t per person | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fibre furnish — production, per capita, Brazil or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 0.1476 t per person against 0.1408 t per person in Brazil as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total fibre furnish — production, per capita between Brazil and Czechia?
- 0.0068 t per person, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Czechia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Czechia rank globally for total fibre furnish — production, per capita?
- Brazil ranks 17th and Czechia ranks 14th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total fibre furnish — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.