Cuba vs Kazakhstan: Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita
Cuba
0.0026 t per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan
0.0021 t per person
in 2024
Cuba rank
91st
Kazakhstan rank
94th
Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita over time
- Cuba
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.0026 t per person against 0.0021 t per person in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0005 t per person.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 91st and Kazakhstan ranks 94th of 129 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0057 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0056 t per person | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0.0019 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0015 t per person | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0.0025 t per person | 0.0019 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0.0025 t per person | 0.0021 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fibre furnish — production, per capita, Cuba or Kazakhstan?
- Cuba, at 0.0026 t per person against 0.0021 t per person in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total fibre furnish — production, per capita between Cuba and Kazakhstan?
- 0.0005 t per person, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Kazakhstan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Kazakhstan rank globally for total fibre furnish — production, per capita?
- Cuba ranks 91st and Kazakhstan ranks 94th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total fibre furnish — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.