Georgia vs Pakistan: Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita
Georgia
0.0029 t per person
in 2024
Pakistan
0.0024 t per person
in 2024
Georgia rank
90th
Pakistan rank
92nd
Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita over time
- Georgia
- Pakistan
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0.0029 t per person against 0.0024 t per person in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0005 t per person.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.2 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Pakistan ahead.
Georgia ranks 90th and Pakistan ranks 92nd of 129 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.001 t per person | 0.0041 t per person | 0.0031 t per person | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 0.0027 t per person | 0.0029 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 0.0029 t per person | 0.0025 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fibre furnish — production, per capita, Georgia or Pakistan?
- Georgia, at 0.0029 t per person against 0.0024 t per person in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total fibre furnish — production, per capita between Georgia and Pakistan?
- 0.0005 t per person, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Pakistan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Pakistan rank globally for total fibre furnish — production, per capita?
- Georgia ranks 90th and Pakistan ranks 92nd of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total fibre furnish — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.