Guatemala vs Namibia: Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita
Guatemala
0.0062 t per person
in 2024
Namibia
0.0066 t per person
in 2024
Guatemala rank
69th
Namibia rank
68th
Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita over time
- Guatemala
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0.0066 t per person against 0.0062 t per person in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0004 t per person.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Namibia ahead.
Guatemala ranks 69th and Namibia ranks 68th of 129 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.002 t per person | 0.0036 t per person | 0.0016 t per person | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0.006 t per person | 0.0065 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0.0064 t per person | 0.0069 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fibre furnish — production, per capita, Guatemala or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 0.0066 t per person against 0.0062 t per person in Guatemala as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total fibre furnish — production, per capita between Guatemala and Namibia?
- 0.0004 t per person, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Namibia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Guatemala and Namibia rank globally for total fibre furnish — production, per capita?
- Guatemala ranks 69th and Namibia ranks 68th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total fibre furnish — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.