Hungary vs Latvia: Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita
Hungary
0.0548 t per person
in 2024
Latvia
0.0501 t per person
in 2024
Hungary rank
36th
Latvia rank
39th
Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita over time
- Hungary
- Latvia
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 0.0548 t per person against 0.0501 t per person in Latvia, a difference of 0.0047 t per person.
That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 36th and Latvia ranks 39th of 129 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.027 t per person | 0.0129 t per person | 0.014 t per person | Hungary |
| 2000s | 0.0381 t per person | 0.0271 t per person | 0.0111 t per person | Hungary |
| 2010s | 0.0542 t per person | 0.0411 t per person | 0.0131 t per person | Hungary |
| 2020s | 0.0545 t per person | 0.051 t per person | 0.0034 t per person | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fibre furnish — production, per capita, Hungary or Latvia?
- Hungary, at 0.0548 t per person against 0.0501 t per person in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total fibre furnish — production, per capita between Hungary and Latvia?
- 0.0047 t per person, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Hungary and Latvia rank globally for total fibre furnish — production, per capita?
- Hungary ranks 36th and Latvia ranks 39th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total fibre furnish — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.