Hungary vs Lithuania: Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita
Hungary
0.0548 t per person
in 2024
Lithuania
0.0567 t per person
in 2024
Hungary rank
36th
Lithuania rank
34th
Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita over time
- Hungary
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.0567 t per person against 0.0548 t per person in Hungary, a difference of 0.0019 t per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 36th and Lithuania ranks 34th of 129 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 3 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.027 t per person | 0.009 t per person | 0.018 t per person | Hungary |
| 2000s | 0.0381 t per person | 0.0208 t per person | 0.0173 t per person | Hungary |
| 2010s | 0.0542 t per person | 0.0494 t per person | 0.0048 t per person | Hungary |
| 2020s | 0.0545 t per person | 0.0581 t per person | 0.0037 t per person | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fibre furnish — production, per capita, Hungary or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 0.0567 t per person against 0.0548 t per person in Hungary as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total fibre furnish — production, per capita between Hungary and Lithuania?
- 0.0019 t per person, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Lithuania?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Hungary and Lithuania rank globally for total fibre furnish — production, per capita?
- Hungary ranks 36th and Lithuania ranks 34th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total fibre furnish — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.