Iceland vs Singapore: Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita
Iceland
0.0647 t per person
in 2024
Singapore
0.0666 t per person
in 2024
Iceland rank
31st
Singapore rank
30th
Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita over time
- Iceland
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 0.0666 t per person against 0.0647 t per person in Iceland, a difference of 0.0019 t per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Singapore ahead.
Iceland ranks 31st and Singapore ranks 30th of 129 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0372 t per person | 0.0777 t per person | 0.0404 t per person | Singapore |
| 2000s | 0.047 t per person | 0.0805 t per person | 0.0335 t per person | Singapore |
| 2010s | 0.0805 t per person | 0.1171 t per person | 0.0366 t per person | Singapore |
| 2020s | 0.0671 t per person | 0.0716 t per person | 0.0045 t per person | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fibre furnish — production, per capita, Iceland or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 0.0666 t per person against 0.0647 t per person in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total fibre furnish — production, per capita between Iceland and Singapore?
- 0.0019 t per person, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Singapore?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Singapore rank globally for total fibre furnish — production, per capita?
- Iceland ranks 31st and Singapore ranks 30th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total fibre furnish — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.