Paraguay vs Zimbabwe: Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita
Paraguay
0.0043 t per person
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.0042 t per person
in 2024
Paraguay rank
82nd
Zimbabwe rank
84th
Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita over time
- Paraguay
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 0.0043 t per person against 0.0042 t per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Paraguay ahead.
Paraguay ranks 82nd and Zimbabwe ranks 84th of 129 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Paraguay averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0062 t per person | 0.0074 t per person | 0.0012 t per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0.0056 t per person | 0.0089 t per person | 0.0034 t per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.0049 t per person | 0.0049 t per person | 0 t per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.0044 t per person | 0.0044 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fibre furnish — production, per capita, Paraguay or Zimbabwe?
- Paraguay, at 0.0043 t per person against 0.0042 t per person in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total fibre furnish — production, per capita between Paraguay and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0001 t per person, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Zimbabwe?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Paraguay and Zimbabwe rank globally for total fibre furnish — production, per capita?
- Paraguay ranks 82nd and Zimbabwe ranks 84th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total fibre furnish — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total fibre furnish — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.